About ZEPA

ZEPA aims to accelerate port decarbonization by making battery-electric container handling equipment affordable and accessible this decade.

A monochromatic blue-toned image showing a large container ship docked at a port terminal, with massive ship-to-shore cranes loading and unloading containers. The surrounding area is filled with stacks of shipping containers, illustrating the scale and industrial infrastructure of port operations. The ship and cranes dominate the foreground, while additional terminal structures extend into the distance along the waterfront.

Mission

Make untethered battery-electric container handling equipment affordable and accessible by 2030

Vision

Accelerate port decarbonization

ZEPA is a cross-value-chain port alliance; it is set up to tackle specific BE-CHE adoption challenges together with its members

Cross value chain

Global representation of terminal operators, OEMs & ports working together towards a shared objective

Critical mass to enable a faster and cheaper transition

Focused

4 critical issues that require collective action to accelerate adoption

Aimed to deliver work program in next ~12-18 months

For members by members

C-level commitment & engagement to drive objectives forward and ensure deliverables are adopted

Functional internal expertise to shape deliverables

Lean

Strong involvement of independent 3rd party Secretariat to drive progress and ensure objectivity

Collaboration with existing organizations to leverage existing work and avoid duplication of efforts

Our work program

To accelerate adoption of battery-electric CHE, we’re leading collective action in 4 workstreams.

Projected Demand

Voluntary Design Standards

Power Infrastructure Roll-out

Adoption Incentives

Main activity and scope

Measure and report projected demand for untethered BE-CHE.1

Develop voluntary, open, and accessible design standards3 for untethered BE-CHE.

Collect best practices and create a technical checklist for ports to develop electrification roadmaps – incl. all cargo port segments.

Create toolkits and best practices for financial institutions and governments to introduce incentives for BE-CHE fleets.

Objective

Encourage scaled-up production capacity and shorter lead times of BE-CHE by OEMs, by providing OEMs with confidence of terminal operators’ demand.

Reduce product costs through scaled production and accelerated learning effects.

Bring down the TCO of battery-electric equipment and simplify implementation through voluntary design standards that enable interoperability and compatibility of charging solutions and batteries.

Facilitate cost-efficient power infrastructure roll-out required for BE-CHE, shore power, and other cargo segments at ports.

Create better market conditions for zero-emission fleets based on a review and outlook of technology development. Help accelerate the adoption of BE-CHE, including enabling infrastructure.

Envisaged end-deliverable

3rd party publication with aggregated and anonymized projected market demand and estimated commitments by untethered CHE type towards 2030, based on statistical research survey coordinated by independent 3rd party.2

Voluntary, open, and accessible "design standards" for battery packs, charging solutions, their interoperability with equipment, and with management systems for untethered BE-CHE.1

Best practice manuals for power infrastructure roll-out for terminal operators, ports, and grid companies, including a technical checklist and best practices for an implementation and investment strategy and plan, with clarity on ownership.

Toolkits to incentivize BE-CHE adoption & best practices on how and when to operationalize them, e.g., by port authorities in their terminal awarding processes or by international finance institutions in their advisory or financing strategy.

Driving Members

Terminal operators

Terminal operators & OEMs

Port Authorities & Terminal Operators

Port Authorities & Terminal Operators

Note: (1) Untethered equipment includes terminal tractors, straddle carriers & reach stackers. BE = Battery-Electric (2) Subject to strict data protocols to prevent information disclosures, protect confidentiality and ensure antitrust compliance (3) Development of standards are open to all participants and subject to necessary legal protocols; the developed standards are strictly voluntary to adopt.

Our work program

To accelerate adoption of battery-electric CHE, we’re leading collective action in 4 workstreams.

Projected Demand

Main activity and scope

Measure and report projected demand for untethered BE-CHE1.1

Objective

Encourage scaled-up production capacity and shorter lead times of BE-CHE by OEMs, by providing OEMs with confidence of terminal operators’ demand.Reduce product costs through scaled production and accelerated learning effects.

Envisaged end-deliverable

3rd party publication with aggregated and anonymized projected market demand and estimated commitments by untethered CHE type towards 2030, based on statistical research survey coordinated by independent 3rd party.2

Driving Members

Terminal operators

Voluntary Design Standards

Main activity and scope

Develop voluntary, open, and accessible design standards3 for untethered BE-CHE.

Objective

Bring down the TCO of battery-electric equipment and simplify implementation through voluntary design standards that enable interoperability and compatibility of charging solutions and batteries.

Envisaged end-deliverable

Voluntary, open, and accessible "design standards" for battery packs, charging solutions, their interoperability with equipment, and with management systems for untethered BE-CHE.1

Driving Members

Terminal operators & OEMs

Power Infrastructure Roll-out

Main activity and scope

Collect best practices and create a technical checklist for ports to develop electrification roadmaps – incl. all cargo port segments.

Objective

Facilitate cost-efficient power infrastructure roll-out required for BE-CHE, shore power, and other cargo segments at ports.

Envisaged end-deliverable

Best practice manuals for power infrastructure roll-out for terminal operators, ports, and grid companies, including a technical checklist and best practices for an implementation and investment strategy and plan, with clarity on ownership.

Driving Members

Port Authorities & Terminal Operators

Adoption Incentives

Main activity and scope

Create toolkits and best practices for financial institutions and governments to introduce incentives for BE-CHE fleets.

Objective

Create better market conditions for zero-emission fleets based on a review and outlook of technology development. Help accelerate the adoption of BE-CHE, including enabling infrastructure.

Envisaged end-deliverable

Toolkits to incentivize BE-CHE adoption & best practices on how and when to operationalize them, e.g., by port authorities in their terminal awarding processes or by international finance institutions in their advisory or financing strategy.

Driving Members

Port Authorities & Terminal Operators

Note: (1) Untethered equipment includes terminal tractors, straddle carriers & reach stackers. BE = Battery-Electric (2) Subject to strict data protocols to prevent information disclosures, protect confidentiality and ensure antitrust compliance (3) Development of standards are open to all participants and subject to necessary legal protocols; the developed standards are strictly voluntary to adopt.

ZEPA Members

How we operate:
Our governance

SteerCo: ZEPA is governed by its Steering Committee which provides strategic direction to ZEPA and has the ultimate responsibility for decisions made on behalf of ZEPA.


Sub-committees: ZEPA actions and deliverables will be coordinated and undertaken by dedicated Workstream Sub-Committees. Member Representatives to contribute functional/technical expertise for creation of Workstream deliverables.

Secretariat: The program manager. The Secretariat manages the work program, and ensures pace, focus, and objectivity of activities and deliverables. It is responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of ZEPA and coordinating member activities, including research and analysis, deliverable creation project management, and industry engagement. The Secretariat is currently run by Systemiq.

FAQs

Find answers to commonly asked questions about ZEPA, its mission, activities, and membership.

I note you are already running. Can I still become a member?

Yes, membership is open on a rolling basis. Please get in touch with the Secretariat for more information.

For how long will ZEPA run?

It is intended to run for 12-18 months from January 2024. However, members can decide to extend the work program.

Why only BE, and not hydrogen?

ZEPA aims to retain focus to create impact over a short period. Research indicates that BE-CHE is the more realistic solution in the short to medium term because it is equally or more competitive than HE-CHE in most use cases:

Affordability: TCO of HE-CHE is, on average, analyzed to be 47% higher than BE-CHE, even when considering effects of a lower charging downtime, a cost barrier that is incapable of being narrowed sufficiently before 2030 even with industry action, given the points below.

Accessibility: HE-CHE will not be accessible to terminal operators at scale in time for net zero targets because (i) OEMs do not expect the first prototypes before 2025 and the first commercially viable products before 2030; and (ii) green hydrogen shortages are expected to endure.

Practicality: HE-CHE presents heightened handling challenges and complexities given health and safety considerations.

Does that mean ZEPA does not see hydrogen as a solution for CHE?

We believe that in some regions, cases and in the longer term it may be a solution.

Is the voluntary design standards workstream accepted from an anti-trust perspective?

Yes. The work program has been approved by our external legal counsel, K&L Gates.

All standards are voluntary and will be made accessible to the wider industry. The development process is open to all industry participants and will be run by an independent 3rd party (The Secretariat) and monitored by an external legal counsel (K&L Gates).

Isn’t there a conflict of interest between OEMs & terminal operators?

It is in the interest of OEMs as well as Terminal Operators (TOs) that sufficient design elements remain open for OEMs to innovate and differentiate.

How can various perspectives be heard and integrated?

The process is run by the Secretariat as an independent 3rd party to incorporate and manage various perspectives, with transparency on considerations leading to choices made.

Why should the port industry develop their own standards?

OEMs & TOs have a shared objective to collaborate on voluntary industry standards to enable a faster and cheaper transition vs awaiting regulatory standards which by then in retrospect may increase product costs.

Still have a question?